Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in

• Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "RE: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux"
• Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: 2.2 generating odd TCP resets?"
• In reply to: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in"
• Next in thread: Urban Widmark: "Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 08:29:47PM +0000, Petr Vandrovec wrote:

> It is not correct. At first, duplicated define_bool breaks xconfig (AFAIK),
> and worse, first test is ignored at all by your code. Maybe something
> like (untested)
>
> if [ "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" = "m" -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" = "y" ]; then
> define_bool CONFIG_SMB_NLS y
> else
> define_bool CONFIG_SMB_NLS n
> fi
>
> if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \
> -o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o "$CONFIG_NCPFS_NLS" = "y" \
> -o "$CONFIG_SMB_NLS" = "y"; then
> define_bool CONFIG_NLS y
> else
> define_bool CONFIG_NLS n
> fi
>
> could work (I did not checked whether CONFIG_FAT_FS & CONFIG_NTFS_FS
> are always defined).

This works as well, and FAT and NTFS are always defined.

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "RE: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux"
• Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: 2.2 generating odd TCP resets?"
• In reply to: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in"
• Next in thread: Urban Widmark: "Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST