Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses

From: Matt Peterson (mpeterson@calderasystems.com)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 10:48:13 EST

Next message: james blanding: "2.2.17+raid SMP not rebooting"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8, usb, unresolved symbols"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:23:26 -0600
> From: Matt Peterson <mpeterson@calderasystems.com>
>
> Have you thought about an SOL_SOCKET level socket option? It might
> be more intuitive for programmers than an ioctl and could be
> documented with sockets where it will be used.
>
> Where did I say "ioctl"?

Sorry, I've had ioctl on the brain lately. Yes, sysctl is a good
solution.

-- 
Matthew Peterson
Sr. Software Engineer
Caldera Systems, Inc
mpeterson@caldera.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: james blanding: "2.2.17+raid SMP not rebooting"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8, usb, unresolved symbols"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST