Re: atm_devs protection.

From: Werner Almesberger (Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 18:01:50 EST

Next message: daniel sheltraw: "TLB, page table, and sound"
Previous message: Daiki Matsuda: "Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
In reply to: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Next in thread: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Reply: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:
> Yeah, a lot of the add/remove device ATM code (and, IMO, even the vcc
> open/close) code is pretty suspect.

That's actually a bit of an understatement: device removal and module
unloading it were never really meant to work :-) About the only thing
that might be okay right now is destruction of an atmtcp device ...

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH           Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch /
/_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: daniel sheltraw: "TLB, page table, and sound"
Previous message: Daiki Matsuda: "Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
In reply to: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Next in thread: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Reply: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: atm_devs protection."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:14 EST