Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 17:29:22 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: use of add_interrupt_randomness in drivers missing in many drivers"
Previous message: Daiki Matsuda: "__bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
In reply to: Daiki Matsuda: "__bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
Next in thread: Daiki Matsuda: "Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
Reply: Daiki Matsuda: "Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
Reply: Daiki Matsuda: "Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I tested kernel 2.2.18-pre16. And include/asm-i386/delay.h is modified
> from 2.2.17. Some non generous kernel modules use udelay() function in
> its file. But, The function __bad_udelay in delay.h is referred but
> any instance does not exist. So it's caused Unresolved Symbol problem.

This is a trap to catch modules using overlarge delays. What modules have the
problem ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: use of add_interrupt_randomness in drivers missing in many drivers"
Previous message: Daiki Matsuda: "__bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
In reply to: Daiki Matsuda: "__bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
Next in thread: Daiki Matsuda: "Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
Reply: Daiki Matsuda: "Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
Reply: Daiki Matsuda: "Re: __bad_udelay() is not included in 2.2.18-pre16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:14 EST