RE: An excellent read on CPU caches

• Next message: Richard Henderson: "Re: Patch to remove undefined C code"
• Previous message: George: "Re: failure to blank CDRWs (2.2.18pre15 smp ide-scsi hp7100i)"
• Maybe in reply to: David Ford: "An excellent read on CPU caches"
• Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: An excellent read on CPU caches"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

There are some details in error in this document, and the discussion of
cache-coherence might be expanded or dropped altogether, rather than hinted
at. I've sent a long note to the author with "diffs' for a next edition.

Thanks for pointing it out, I know of several situations in which it will be
useful to point people at it.

Marty

-----Original Message-----
From: David Ford [mailto:david@linux.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 12:53 PM
To: LKML
Subject: An excellent read on CPU caches

http://www.systemlogic.net/articles/00/10/cache/print.php3

--
"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
'committed'."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Richard Henderson: "Re: Patch to remove undefined C code"
• Previous message: George: "Re: failure to blank CDRWs (2.2.18pre15 smp ide-scsi hp7100i)"
• Maybe in reply to: David Ford: "An excellent read on CPU caches"
• Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: An excellent read on CPU caches"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:12 EST