Re: [BUG]: Ext2 Corruption in test10pre3 (incl. Oops)

From: Roger Larsson (roger.larsson@norran.net)
Date: Tue Oct 17 2000 - 15:06:19 EST


Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > > Trace; c014efde <read_inode_bitmap+3e/90>
> > > Trace; c014f240 <load_inode_bitmap+210/230>
> > > Trace; c014f6af <ext2_new_inode+29f/700>
> > > Trace; c021e87e <unix_write_space+2e/50>
> > Huh?
> > > Trace; c01523af <ext2_create+1f/c0>
> >
> > The rest of trace is OK, but WTF is net/unix/*.c code is doing here?
>
> The traces always (or almost always) have crud in them - it's not a real
> stack-trace, it's just a printout of the stack contents that match
> addresses in the text region. So the unix_write_space thing was probably
> from the previous system call and just hadn't been overwritten.
>
> Linus
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Hmm..
Might this problem be related to...

Tigrans:
> Subject: test10-pre1 BUG at page_alloc.c:221!

Quintelas:
> Subject: I've got the BAD_RANGE BUG in rmqueue!!! (Pre9-4)

Richard Guenther
> Subject: [OOPS][BUG] with 2.4.0-test9
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:12 EST