Re: New Benchmark tools, lookie looky........

From: Vojtech Pavlik (vojtech@suse.cz)
Date: Tue Oct 17 2000 - 12:29:01 EST

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Patch to remove undefined C code"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Patch to remove undefined C code"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: New Benchmark tools, lookie looky........"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: New Benchmark tools, lookie looky........"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: New Benchmark tools, lookie looky........"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 09:49:35AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:

> > raw disks? block disks? both work.
>
> Sorry, what I forgot to tell you is that I am doing direct access at the
> IO level. This is underneath the driver. This is in the realm of
> bit-banging but with sanity.

But does this give any benchmarking benefit over traditional access via
/dev/hda?

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Patch to remove undefined C code"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Patch to remove undefined C code"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: New Benchmark tools, lookie looky........"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: New Benchmark tools, lookie looky........"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: New Benchmark tools, lookie looky........"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:11 EST