Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler)

• Next message: Gnea: "Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)"
• Previous message: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4-way SuperServer8050"
• In reply to: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler)"
• Next in thread: Jesse Pollard: "Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Matthew Hawkins wrote:
> On 2000-10-11 09:45:30 -0500, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> > Until user memory resource quotas are included in the kernel, there will be
> > nothing else that can be done. Even with resource quotas, if the total of
> > active users exceeds the resource then the same/equivalent situation occurs.
>
> So setrlimit() with RLIMIT_DATA, RLIMIT_STACK, RLIMIT_RSS,
> RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, RLIMIT_AS et al is a null op?
>
> If so, I wish to register a complaint ;-)

Don't send a complaint, send patches ...

regards,

Rik

--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
       -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/		http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Gnea: "Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)"
• Previous message: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4-way SuperServer8050"
• In reply to: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler)"
• Next in thread: Jesse Pollard: "Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST