Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b

From: Vojtech Pavlik (vojtech@suse.cz)
Date: Tue Oct 10 2000 - 05:13:09 EST

Next message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: Calling current() from interrupt context"
Next in thread: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Markus Pfeiffer wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:43:33AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a
> > setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wire cable
> > without problems as well. I've even seen systems shipped like that.
> ^^^
> ??? Really ??? Are they trying to save money by doing that??

Yes, I'd guess so. Anyway, if the cable is indeed less than say 5-inch
long, I think there is no reason this couldn't work. The crosstalks and
delays are minimal in this situation ...

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: Calling current() from interrupt context"
Next in thread: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:15 EST