On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, bert hubert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 02:38:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > So the process that gave X the bitmap dies. What now? Are we going to
> > depend on X un-counting the resources?
> >
> > I'd prefer just X having a higher "mm nice level" or something.
>
> I wonder how many megabytes we can fill with all messages about
> an OOM killer. I remember threads about this from '94 onwards.
> Perhaps we can finally have a sane one now :-)
In reality, the OOM killer I mailed a few days ago behaves
quite well in the real world.
I hope Linus will be as sensitive to theoretical arguments
with no foundation in reality as I am (ie. not), so we'll
have SOMETHING in the kernel soon.
If we later find out there are some problems with the OOM
killer, we can always change it then. No need to hold up
a reasonable solution when the current kernel has NO solution
to the problem at all ...
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST