Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

From: David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Date: Mon Oct 09 2000 - 15:28:19 EST

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: usb and smp problems with 2.4.0-test9/2.2.18-pre15"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > a good idea to have SIGKILL delivery speeded up for every SIGKILL ...
>
> yep.

How about SIGTERM a bit before SIGKILL then re-evaluate the OOM N usecs
later?

-d

-- "There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: usb and smp problems with 2.4.0-test9/2.2.18-pre15"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:13 EST