On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> ie should we say that ALL distros have to ship with, and be compatible with the
> standard kernel? If a distro has a patch that they want in the kernel, and the
> mainstream kernel doesn't feel it belongs, should it be labeled differently?
> Do we go with a Debian Linux, Redhat Linux, etc.. accepting that they are all
> different, but from a common heritage
Why not? Worked for BSD just fine.
> or should there be a 'seal of approval' so that
> a distro can indicate it is 100% linux mainstream, as in
> SomeDistro Linux, '100% Linux Standard Compliant'
Yeah... And then we'll have every marketdroid and his mom
_really_ trying hard to get every patch into the main tree. Thanks, but no
thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:27 EST