Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@caldera.de)
Date: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 05:09:29 EST

Next message: jeff millar: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size"
In reply to: James Sutherland: "Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++"
Next in thread: Marty Fouts: "RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

James Sutherland <jas88@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> That sounds likely to be a common case. Every real bookstore I've seen
> lately has had books on C, C++, Linux, Windows etc. programming - I have
> yet to see one with a since ANSI or IEEE document for sale!

> OTOH, these standards documents aren't the most readable of text. Perhaps
> a human-friendly explanation of the standard would be more widely read?

For C there is K&R II - that's should be enough explanation.

Christoph

-- 
Always remember that you are unique.  Just like everyone else.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: jeff millar: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size"
In reply to: James Sutherland: "Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++"
Next in thread: Marty Fouts: "RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:26 EST