> you have of course used kgcc for the compile job ? 2.96 maybe is chewing
> the kernel source a little bit too well.
>
> Did you edit the makefiles to use kgcc instead of gcc ?
2.2.18pre12 (coming to a kernel archive near you in 2 or 3 minutes) now
knows about both kgcc and gcc272 (RH and Debian) automatically thanks to
Arjan.
I will try and get the gcc 2.96 patches folded in before 2.2.18 (that and
S/390 sorting out are the ones left). Anyone who builds with 2.96 for a
production system is IMHO a complete loon but for those who want to see how
it works and stomp on problems it should I hope be possible to play with
2.96 builds by then [x86 anyway - most non x86 is probably ok]
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:25 EST