Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2000 - 10:23:51 EST

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [CFT][PATCH] ext2 directories in pagecache"
Previous message: Torben Mathiasen: "Re: [PATCH] link-order of drivers outside drivers/scsi (i2o)"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:13:59PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Can anyone see any problems with the concept of this approach? This can be

It works only on top of a filesystem while all the checkpointing clever stuff
is done internally by the DB (infact it _needs_ O_SYNC when it works on the
fs).

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [CFT][PATCH] ext2 directories in pagecache"
Previous message: Torben Mathiasen: "Re: [PATCH] link-order of drivers outside drivers/scsi (i2o)"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:22 EST