Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:11:43AM +0200, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> > I just checked one oracle system and it did not lock the memory. And I
>
> If that memory is used for I/O cache then such memory should
> released when the system runs into swap instead of swapping it out
> too (otherwise it's not cache anymore and it could be slower than
> re-reading from disk the real data in rawio).
Yes, but how does the application detect that it should free the mem?
Also you often have more overhead reading out of a database then
having preprocessed data in swap.
> > Customers with performance problems very often start with too little
> > memory, but they cannot upgrade until this really big job finishes :-(
> >
> > Another issue about shm swapping is interactive transactions, where
> > some users have very large contexts and go for a coffee before
> > submitting. This memory can be swapped.
>
> Agreed, that's why I said shm performance under swap is very important
> as well (I'm not understimating it).
fine :-)
Greetings
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:20 EST