Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks

From: Juan J. Quintela (quintela@fi.udc.es)
Date: Tue Sep 26 2000 - 09:04:24 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Previous message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "[PATCH] Compile fix for Alpha"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> "ingo" == Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:

>> Thank You! Seems to be much better now:
>>
>> Test of 2.4.0-t9p6 + vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 + vmfixes-B2-deadlock.patch

ingo> note that this is effectively test8-pre7 (with a couple of more fixes and
ingo> the new multiqueue stuff), so you might want to test that as well.

Ingo, I am very wrong, or vmfixes-B2_deadlock is not included in
test9-pre7.

Later, Juan.

-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Previous message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "[PATCH] Compile fix for Alpha"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:17 EST