Re: the new VMt

From: Erik Andersen (andersen@codepoet.org)
Date: Mon Sep 25 2000 - 18:14:11 EST


On Mon Sep 25, 2000 at 02:04:19PM -0600, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
>
> > all of the pending requests just as long as they are serialised, is
> > this a problem?
>
> I think you are solving the wrong problem. On a small memory machine, the kernel,
> utilities, and applications should be configured to use little memory.
> BusyBox is better than BeanCount.
>

Granted that smaller apps can help -- for a particular workload. But while I
am very partial to BusyBox (in fact I am about to cut a new release) I can
assure you that OOM is easily possible even when your user space is tiny. I do
it all the time. There are mallocs in busybox and when under memory pressure,
the kernel still tends to fall over...

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen   email:  andersee@debian.org
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:16 EST