Re: mount -t bind gone?

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Mon Sep 25 2000 - 15:53:48 EST

Next message: Peter Osterlund: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: the new VMt"
In reply to: Andries Brouwer: "Re: mount -t bind gone?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Followup to: <20000925225020.A13082@veritas.com>
By author: Andries Brouwer <aeb@veritas.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 11:29:48AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > I guess mount -t bind is officially gone. What is the new official
> > replacement? New system call?
>
> mount --bind
>
> (use mount from util-linux 2.10o)
>

Hmm... what do you think is the best way to do this in autofs? Should
I call mount(8), or just mount(2)? In particular, does:

a) umount(8) do the right thing with these, and
b) mount(8) record this in /etc/mtab?

Thanks,

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Peter Osterlund: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: the new VMt"
In reply to: Andries Brouwer: "Re: mount -t bind gone?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:16 EST