Re: the new VMt

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Sep 25 2000 - 14:09:31 EST


> > Indeed. But we wont fail the kmalloc with a NULL return
>
> Isn't that the preferred behaviour, though? If we are completely out
> of VM on a no-swap machine, we should be killing one of the existing
> processes rather than preventing any progress and keeping all of the
> old tasks alive but deadlocked.

Unless Im missing something we wont kill any task in that condition - even
a SIGKILL will make no odds as everyone is asleep in kmalloc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:16 EST