On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 07:21:48PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> Ok, sorry. Kernel development is proceding at a furious pace and I sometimes
> lose track.
No problem :).
> I seem to remember that people were impressed by classzone, but that the
> implementation was very non-trivial and hard to grok. One of the reasons
Yes. Classzone is certainly more complex.
> There is no such thing as 'under swap'. There are lots of loadpatterns that
> will generate different kinds of memory pressure. Just calling it 'under
> swap' gives entirely the wrong impression.
Sorry for not being precise. I meant one of those load patterns.
> 'rivaling virtual memory' code. Energies spent on Rik's VM will yield far
> higher differential improvement.
I've spent efforts on classzone as well, and since I think it's way superior
approch I'll at least port it on top of 2.4.0-test9 as soon as time
permits to generate some number.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:15 EST