On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > i think an application should not fail due to other applications
> > allocating too much RAM. OOM behavior should be a central thing and based
>
> At least Linus's point is that doing perfect accounting (at
> least on the userspace allocation side) may cause you to waste
> resources, failing even if you could still run and I tend to
> agree with him. We're lazy on that side and that's global win in
> most cases.
OK, so do you guys want my OOM-killer selection code
in 2.4? ;)
(that will fix the OOM case in the rare situations
where it occurs and do the expected thing most of the
time)
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:15 EST