Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM

From: David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Date: Sun Sep 24 2000 - 17:41:04 EST


Shawn Starr wrote:

> Odd, Isn't 777 insecure for shared memory segments?

very. rasterman may make cute stuff, but reliable in adverse conditions and
secure is completely out of the ballpark.

-d

--
      "There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are
      virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President


- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:12 EST