Re: [Xpert] Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM

From: Keith Packard (keithp@keithp.com)
Date: Sun Sep 24 2000 - 16:58:14 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2"
Previous message: Shawn Starr: "Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
In reply to: Shawn Starr: "Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
Next in thread: safemode: "Re: [Xpert] Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
Reply: safemode: "Re: [Xpert] Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Odd, Isn't 777 insecure for shared memory segments?

Yes; Enlightenment does have it's own little set of features...

keithp@keithp.com XFree86 Core Team SuSE, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2"
Previous message: Shawn Starr: "Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
In reply to: Shawn Starr: "Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
Next in thread: safemode: "Re: [Xpert] Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
Reply: safemode: "Re: [Xpert] Re: Current CVS version of X does indeed break wrt SHM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:12 EST