Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM

From: Matthew Kirkwood (matthew@hairy.beasts.org)
Date: Sun Sep 24 2000 - 05:13:55 EST


On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, safemode wrote:

> Reply ALL also results in 2 mails being sent instead of one but of
> course this is usually not a problem since one is going direct and the
> other is going through vger, but still... it's kind of wasteful to
> resources and i dont see any harm in Reply-to being sent in the
> header. Proftpd's mailing list seems to work fine with it. Is your
> position against it just due to client incompatibility?

As I see it, there are two reasons:

1. Historically, vger's turnaround time (for me at
   least) was several hours. This makes it rather
   hard to hold a coherent discussion.

2. It enables people to distinguish discussions in
   which they are involved from the other noise on
   the list.

Matthew.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:12 EST