dvma error in 2.4.0-test8 and Sparc2

From: John Buswell (johnb@one.net)
Date: Thu Sep 14 2000 - 10:02:41 EST

Next message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee"
Previous message: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

I get the following error when trying to boot 2.4.0-test8 on my sparc 2:

Cannot find dvma for ESP0's SCSI
ESP: Total of 1 ESP hosts found, 0 actually in use.
scsi : 0 hosts.
scsi : detected total.
sunlance.c:v2.00 11/Sep/99 Miguel de Icaza (miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx)
eth0: LANCE 08:00:20:0f:73:f7
eth1: LANCE 08:00:20:0f:73:f7
request_module[scsi_hostadapter]: Root fs not mounted
request_module[scsi_hostadapter]: Root fs not mounted

but it works fine in 2.2.14 :

esp0: IRQ 3 SCSI ID 7 Clk 20MHz CCF=4 TOut 167 NCR53C90A(esp100a)
ESP: Total of 1 ESP hosts found, 1 actually in use.
scsi0 : Sparc ESP100A (NCR53C90A)
scsi : 1 host.
  Vendor: SEAGATE Model: ST15150N Rev: 4611
  Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
esp0: hoping for msgout
  Vendor: IBM Model: CP30540 545MB !Q Rev: ADB7
  Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sdb at scsi0, channel 0, id 6, lun 0
scsi : detected 2 SCSI disks total.
esp0: target 0 [period 200ns offset 15 5.00MHz synchronous SCSI]
SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 8388315 [4095 MB] [4.1
GB]
SCSI device sdb: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 1065912 [520 MB] [0.5
GB]

Is this a bug in 2.4.0-test8 or are there parameters I need to pass to the
kernel in silo to get this to work with 2.4.0-test8? or did i forget to
compile in something?

-- John Buswell

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee"
Previous message: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST