Re: Availability of kdb

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Thu Sep 07 2000 - 12:28:14 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]"
In reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Availability of kdb"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Availability of kdb"
Reply: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Availability of kdb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:

> [...] Hardware problems require a debugger or logic analyzer to fix.
> [...]

'kernel problems need a kernel debugger to fix'. How wrong.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]"
In reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Availability of kdb"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Availability of kdb"
Reply: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Availability of kdb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:30 EST