Brian Hayward writes:
> I also think it's a logical conclusion that a patch to a GPL'd program is
> released under the GPL - even if you don't specifically say so.
Actually, this totally makes sense, because a patch contains "context" lines
and therefore includes GPL code in it - hence it MUST be under the GPL if it
is redistributed.
Cheers, Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:22 EST