Re: [patch] All the fs patches resulting from updating mark_buffer_dirty

• Next message: Harald Dunkel: "test8-pre4: Ooops at boot time"
• Previous message: Mo McKinlay: "Re: [bug] test8-preX crashes X on APM resume >>>Re: [Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details]"
• In reply to: Rasmus Andersen: "[patch] All the fs patches resulting from updating mark_buffer_dirty"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:29:56PM +0200, Rasmus Andersen wrote:
>
> I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran
> Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts a lot of places in the kernel
> (trivially), noticeably the file systems. The URL below points a
> big patch for all these changes.

Looks clean enough to me, but it does rather prevent us from ever
going back to having the separate buffer priority bit in the future if
we want that.

Cheers,
 Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Harald Dunkel: "test8-pre4: Ooops at boot time"
• Previous message: Mo McKinlay: "Re: [bug] test8-preX crashes X on APM resume >>>Re: [Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details]"
• In reply to: Rasmus Andersen: "[patch] All the fs patches resulting from updating mark_buffer_dirty"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST