Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun Sep 03 2000 - 19:26:06 EST

Next message: Paul Jakma: "Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre2 compile fails at smbfs"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alexander Viro wrote:
> > *((unsigned long *)(&x)) = NULL;
>
> free_page(foo()) and we've got problems...

Alan really meant

*((unsigned long *)&(x)) = NULL;

and screw you if it's not an lvalue.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Paul Jakma: "Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre2 compile fails at smbfs"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST