Re: zero-copy TCP

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Sep 03 2000 - 16:41:35 EST

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: zero-copy TCP"
Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: zero-copy TCP"
Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: zero-copy TCP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> It's not faster than card->card DMA, which falls out naturally from my
> zero-copy proposal :-)

We already support card->card DMA for routing with fastrouting

>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: zero-copy TCP"
Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: zero-copy TCP"
Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: zero-copy TCP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST