Re: thread rant [semi-OT]

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Sat Sep 02 2000 - 03:34:36 EST


On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, J. Dow wrote:

> Dan, another thing to consider with multithreading is that it is a way
> to avoid "convoy" effects if there is a nice priority mechanism for
> first in first out messaging. [...]

yep, this is a frequent problem at the level of the kernel. We fixed such
a (longtime) performance bug just a couple of weeks ago in the TCP-accept
logic. We are using FIFO in most places where multiple contexts are
waiting. But is 'shared everything multithreading' the natural solution
for this? Nope, that statement is misleading. 'Multi-contexting' is the
solution. Those contexts can be 'shared-everything threads' or 'isolated
processes' as well.

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST