"Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de> writes:
> Do you think the SA_NOCLDWAIT/queued exit signal approach makes sense ?
I'm not sure whether it's worth the effort. But I'm saying this now
looking at the code for another implementation following the 1:1 model.
In a second stage where we have m kernel threads and n user-level
threads (the ultimate goal) things might be different. But this is
beyond what is needed in the 2.4 kernel so lets just skip the
SA_NOCLDWAIT stuff for now.
-- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST