Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
> But I'd much rather just have the "n+1" thing. The overhead is basically
> nonexistent, and it simplifies so many things.
I see no big problems with this either. The only tricky thing is to
get the stack swapped after the first clone() but this is solvable.
-- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST