Re: NTFS-like streams?

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Mon Aug 14 2000 - 21:46:39 EST


On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Mo McKinlay wrote:

>
> # Aha. So how do you propose to make tar(1) and friends work? BTW, I think
> # that the whole idea of forked files is fundamentally flawed - solutions
> # proposed in that thread are very, erm, convincing in that respect. And
> # idea of changing the glob behaviour... Urgh.
>
> First, go back and read my (admittedly long) messages in which I explain
> *exactly* how to do this. Also, take note that tar doesn't work on NTFS at
> the moment, and won't unless we provide this kind of support.

You know, I've browsed the archives right now and... aside of mentioning
special magical API <wince> - nothing. Admittedly, I could miss the
relevant posting in this dungp^Wthread, so I would really appreciate the
message-ID.

> Second, I'm not at all proposing that glob behaviour be changed - I'm
> proposing that streams aren't made to look like files and files with
> streams aren't made to look like directories - because they're not.

Sigh...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:35 EST