Michael Rothwell wrote:
> If the streams access method we decide on is a _superset_
> of posix Fs requirements, what's the problem? Posix apps
> still get what they expect. So extending the namespace
> to provide streams support seems like a reasonable idea.
So, if the result is that
myfile:resource
is the resource fork for
myfile
where that last one is the same as
myfile:data
then, I'm perfectly happy.
However, when
myfile
starts to refer both to a file and a directory, that's when I get
upset.
Because applications that are used to working on an HFS partition
WILL NOT be able to access
myfile
and
myfile/resource
when someone wants to test-drive this application on an ext2fs.
E.g. not knowing yet wether to convert a filesystem to HFS for running
this fanyc apple-emulator.
Roger.
-- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * Common sense is the collection of * ****** prejudices acquired by age eighteen. -- Albert Einstein ********- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:33 EST