wake_one_more

• Next message: Mike A. Harris: "AMD aa64 architecture."
• Previous message: Andrew Ryan: "Re: super quick >2GB question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[attn: arch maintainers]

i was just going through the parisc semaphore implementation, and i turned
to all the other architectures for inspiration.

willy@femmeviolet:~/kernels/linux-test6/arch$ find . -type f |xargs grep wake_one_more
./alpha/kernel/semaphore.c: wake_one_more(sem);
./sparc/kernel/semaphore.c: wake_one_more(sem);
./mips/kernel/semaphore.c: wake_one_more(sem);
./ppc/kernel/semaphore.c: wake_one_more(sem);
./m68k/kernel/semaphore.c: wake_one_more(sem);
./sparc64/kernel/semaphore.c: wake_one_more(sem);
./sh/kernel/semaphore.c: wake_one_more(sem);
./mips64/kernel/semaphore.c: wake_one_more(sem);

i believe all these are redundant now that the wake_up() call has wake_one
semantics. does anyone else agree?

(evidence: it's missing from i386, the wake_one semantics are present in
arch-independent code).

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Mike A. Harris: "AMD aa64 architecture."
• Previous message: Andrew Ryan: "Re: super quick >2GB question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:26 EST