Re: lock_kernel() & kmalloc - evil together?

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Fri Aug 11 2000 - 16:06:48 EST


On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> Thanks! This is good to know. This means if I use it inside of
> spinlock_irqsave() outside an interrupt, it will tell me not to context
> switch .... Need to look at this.

It's wrong.

It _can_ return false positives, but only
 - for a _globally_ disabled irq region
 - and only on SMP.

Basically, the rule is that if you use a global cli/sti region, all bets
are off.

Spinlocks do not affect the state - not even if they are of the irq-safe
type.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST