Re: Definitions

From: Marc Lehmann (pcg@goof.com)
Date: Fri Aug 11 2000 - 05:51:34 EST

Next message: Xuan Baldauf: "Re: ip_conntrack modules still somewhat buggy"
Previous message: Marc Lehmann: "Re: [PATCH 2.4] make dep can fail (too many args)"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: Definitions"
Next in thread: Marc Lehmann: "Re: Definitions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 10:14:43PM +0200, Martin Dalecki <m.dalecki@stock-world.de> wrote:
> Please DON'T have this accident! There are JFS and XFS on the way - both
> more proven in the real world and there is a *much* higher wight behind
> It is better to wait a bit and let them

BTW, I think that "don't let a filesystem into the kernel because I like
another one which is not ready yet" is a very lousy argument indeed.

Oh linux, where are you headed...

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@opengroup.org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Xuan Baldauf: "Re: ip_conntrack modules still somewhat buggy"
Previous message: Marc Lehmann: "Re: [PATCH 2.4] make dep can fail (too many args)"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: Definitions"
Next in thread: Marc Lehmann: "Re: Definitions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:24 EST