tolkien@mizi.com said:
> I don't understand that 'JFFS ought to be able to do XIP'. There are
> some code for it?
Not yet, but it's not very difficult to do it.
tolkien@mizi.com said:
> we need to prove that the compressed fs is better than XIP in point
> of performace and less use of memory. Though we'll not use XIP, we
> must implemet it.
That makes a lot of sense, I suppose. Although it might be quicker, if
you're only after a {dis,}proof-of-concept, to knock up a read-only
filesystem which does XIP.
-- dwmw2- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST