this is a bit off topic, but i was wondering whether devfs was the correct way to go, or whther to stay with the std /dev entries. I am not sure whether to take the plugne and try it.
regards
chris "boris" ross
--
Rocket Launcher
For when a grenade positively, absolutely, has to be there on time.
>>> David Ford <david@kalifornia.com> 08/10/00 09:17am >>>
I didn't see how that it was when I was booted into it a few moments ago,
what are you referring to specifically?
-d
Pierre Rousselet wrote:
> devfs looks broken in 2.4.0-test6, is'nt it ?
--
"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
'committed'."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST