Martin Mares wrote:
> I think the IRQ stuff per se is correct, but there still remain some
> bugs in the rest of the PCMCIA code.
p.s. the tulip IRQ stuff isn't working or something just before it is the problem,
when i added checks (remember this is 2.3.99 stuff) none of the printks in the
tulip irq handler fired.
somewhere between pcmcia card and software interrupt handler, the bridge is out.
-d
-- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST