Do you get the impression also that getting any real questions addressed is a bit difficult? ;-) (Still no response to my original *polite* inquiry...) (<-- look Alan, no caps!)
My question still remains: What is a feature, and what is a bug fix? And what are the real criteria for making it into the kernel? "Technical merit" is not an acceptable answer. On "technical merit" Linux makes a horrible can opener. (But I'm sure a salesman could sell it as such anyway...)
Mike
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 09:08:52AM +0200, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Michael W Zappe wrote:
> >
> > To start with : Press ENTER after 80 chars.
>
> Ok. And after he has done that, could you please address his
> questions?
>
> Bye,
> --
> Andrea Glorioso sama(at)aglorioso(dot)com
> Padua, Italy
----------------------------------------------
Michael Zappe <zapman@interlan.net>
Chief Architect, Filesystems
Interlan Communications
111 Corning Drive
Cary, NC 27511
"The sorcerer is a Simple Realist: the world
is real--but then so must consciousness be real
since its effects are so tangible. The dullard
finds even wine tasteless but the sorcerer can be
intoxicated by the mere sight of water."
--Hakim Bey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST