Hi Garst,
"Garst R. Reese" <reese@isn.net> writes:
>
> Hmm, how does changing APM_DO_CLI fix the fact that in test5-pre2, an
> explicit cli() was issued? (in the function suspend at line 914).
> I do not understand how you avoid that cli.
I don't :-)
BUT after the cli() call, suspend() calls apm_set_power_state()
which calls set_power_state() which calls apm_bios_call_simple()
which (after my patch) will do __sti() (in APM_DO_CLI) for you
(if you have CONFIG_APM_ALLOW_INTS set) ...
Please try the patch ...
Cheers,
Stephen
-- Stephen Rothwell, Open Source Researcher, Linuxcare, Inc. +61-2-62628990 tel, +61-2-62628991 fax sfr@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST