maximum/optimal # of SMP CPUs between 2.2 and 2.4

From: Zack Brown (zbrown@linuxcare.com)
Date: Tue Aug 08 2000 - 11:51:49 EST

Next message: Borislav Deianov: "Re: Lottery Scheduling?"
Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "[PATCH] raid forgets about copy_from_user()"
Next in thread: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: maximum/optimal # of SMP CPUs between 2.2 and 2.4"
Reply: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: maximum/optimal # of SMP CPUs between 2.2 and 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi folks,

Someone asked me how Linux had improved from 2.2 to 2.4 in terms of the
number of CPUs it could handle at the maximum, and the number it was best
suited for. I grepped through the archives and the sources, but no luck.

Any ideas?

Zack

-- Zack Brown, Developer Services Editor, Linuxcare, Inc. tel: 1-415-354-4878x284, fax: 1-415-701-7457 zbrown@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Borislav Deianov: "Re: Lottery Scheduling?"
Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "[PATCH] raid forgets about copy_from_user()"
Next in thread: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: maximum/optimal # of SMP CPUs between 2.2 and 2.4"
Reply: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: maximum/optimal # of SMP CPUs between 2.2 and 2.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST