Re: Need e1000.o (Intel 1GB NIC driver) for 2.4.x

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Aug 08 2000 - 19:15:01 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: broken __IS_FLG() <linux/fs.h> in 2.4.0-test6-pre?"
In reply to: Matthew Jacob: "Re: Need e1000.o (Intel 1GB NIC driver) for 2.4.x"
Next in thread: Timothy A. DeWees: "Re: Need e1000.o (Intel 1GB NIC driver) for 2.4.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 07:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>

Netgear is supposed to be very supportive with SDK's.

As is Syskonnect, I personally only like their gbit cards :-)

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: broken __IS_FLG() <linux/fs.h> in 2.4.0-test6-pre?"
In reply to: Matthew Jacob: "Re: Need e1000.o (Intel 1GB NIC driver) for 2.4.x"
Next in thread: Timothy A. DeWees: "Re: Need e1000.o (Intel 1GB NIC driver) for 2.4.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST