Re: [RFC] solution for the inet_ntoa problem, buffer allocator

• Next message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: raid5.c and -Werror"
• Previous message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: new latency report"
• In reply to: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [RFC] solution for the inet_ntoa problem, buffer allocator"
• Next in thread: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [RFC] solution for the inet_ntoa problem, buffer allocator"
• Reply: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [RFC] solution for the inet_ntoa problem, buffer allocator"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> when I need function which return statically allocated strings, I
> sometimes use sort of a round-robbin buffer, shared by several
> functions. This way, I can call the same function several times
> without allocating memory, and the number of calls is just limited
> by the total size. Here comes an example (from scratch, completely
> untested).
>
> Any comments ?

Not threadsafe.

--
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: raid5.c and -Werror"
• Previous message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: new latency report"
• In reply to: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [RFC] solution for the inet_ntoa problem, buffer allocator"
• Next in thread: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [RFC] solution for the inet_ntoa problem, buffer allocator"
• Reply: Willy Tarreau: "Re: [RFC] solution for the inet_ntoa problem, buffer allocator"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:21 EST