Re: More 2.2.17pre9 VM issues

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Wed Jul 05 2000 - 09:58:37 EST


On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 06:51:58PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:

> than 2.2. It would be wise not to repeat the same mistake and to actually spend
> the time needed to shake out minor bugs also putting the VM back together
> in something resembling working form even if it delays 2.4 a couple of months.
>
> Right now the best Linux VM is in 2.0.3x. It outperforms 2.2 on most loadings
> and it uses vastly less CPU time.

Unless you have large amount of ram, I believe.

-- 
                       |              http://www.rent-a-nerd.nl
                       |                     - U N I X -
                       |          Inspice et cautus eris - D11T'95

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST