Re: 2.4.0-test3-pre2: corruption in mm?

From: Roger Larsson (roger.larsson@norran.net)
Date: Tue Jul 04 2000 - 12:23:57 EST

Next message: Michael Meding: "2.4.0test3pre2 wouldn't compile with K7 optimizations in md.o and with -m486 in agpgart_be"
Previous message: Tigran Aivazian: "why is inode->i_fop = rdwr_pipe_fops for anonymous pipes?"
In reply to: John Fremlin: "Re: 2.4.0-test3-pre2: corruption in mm?"
Next in thread: Roger Larsson: "Re: 2.4.0-test3-pre2: corruption in mm?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

John Fremlin wrote:
>
> Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@norran.net> writes:
>
> > When I booted up today mount complained that one of my disks
> > was not ok. (/usr)
>
> I had ext2fs corruption (plain 2.4.0-test2) when installing a new
> sendmail. (Which is why I'm not testing out any VM patches on test2,
> sorry Roger). One of the man page's got a lot of really wacky block
> numbers when installed. The first part was there but trying to read
> the tail got:
>

Avoid 2.4.0-test2 since it has KNOWN corruption problems...
2.4.0-test3 should not... this report was about test3
Corrupted files will(?) remain from test2 when upgrading to test3

-- Home page: http://www.norran.net/nra02596/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Meding: "2.4.0test3pre2 wouldn't compile with K7 optimizations in md.o and with -m486 in agpgart_be"
Previous message: Tigran Aivazian: "why is inode->i_fop = rdwr_pipe_fops for anonymous pipes?"
In reply to: John Fremlin: "Re: 2.4.0-test3-pre2: corruption in mm?"
Next in thread: Roger Larsson: "Re: 2.4.0-test3-pre2: corruption in mm?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST