shared memory ?

From: Mircea Damian (dmircea@linux.kappa.ro)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2000 - 07:35:46 EST

Next message: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Previous message: Vandoorselaere Yoann: "Re: Low Latency Patch"
Next in thread: Khimenko Victor: "Re: shared memory ?"
Reply: Khimenko Victor: "Re: shared memory ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Is this normal? I mean is it normal that shared memory is 0?

# (uname -a; free; cat /proc/meminfo)
Linux taz 2.4.0-test1-ac18 #3 Thu Jun 15 15:43:21 EEST 2000 i686 unknown
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 126236 121104 5132 0 2384 35284
-/+ buffers/cache: 83436 42800
Swap: 136512 3672 132840
total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 129265664 124039168 5226496 0 2441216 36163584
Swap: 139788288 3760128 136028160
MemTotal: 126236 kB
MemFree: 5104 kB
MemShared: 0 kB
Buffers: 2384 kB
Cached: 35316 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 126236 kB
LowFree: 5104 kB
SwapTotal: 136512 kB
SwapFree: 132840 kB

-- Mircea Damian E-mails: dmircea@kappa.ro, dmircea@roedu.net WebPage: http://taz.mania.k.ro/~dmircea/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Russell King: "Re: [PATCH #2] console lock grabbed too early in printk..."
Previous message: Vandoorselaere Yoann: "Re: Low Latency Patch"
Next in thread: Khimenko Victor: "Re: shared memory ?"
Reply: Khimenko Victor: "Re: shared memory ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST